Nationalism vs. Globalism
The globalist believes in a one-world government. The nationalist believes in a national government.
The nationalist argues that a one-world government would be evil (ethically) or wasteful and inept (economically). Thus, he argues that government is only evil or wasteful or inept up until a certain scale. If it is true that government is evil, wasteful, or inept on arbitrarily large scales, then why would government not be evil, wasteful, and inept on smaller scales as well?
The true difference between the nationalist and globalist then, is only of mere arbitrary scale. They each believe in the use of force. They each submit to other men (the State Official) or conform to groups (political appealing) in order to get what they want rather than to earn as individuals.
If government is all of these terrible things, then why would it somehow not be these terrible things at the nation, state, county, city, village, or neighborhood level? At least the globalist applies his servility to other men or his conformity to groups in a consistent manner.